Comparing Paper- and AR-Based Assembly Manuals in Task Performance, dlPFC Hemodynamic Responses, and Perceived Workload
3.80T1 sourceHuman Factors (SAGE / HFES)
Source record
Published by Human Factors (SAGE / HFES) (T1 source). The original is at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00187208261439486?af=R.
Pipeline notes
The summary and note below are generated by the signal pipeline — they are Beyond Desk’s reading, not quotations from the source.
SummaryControlled study comparing paper-based, user-fixed AR, and world-fixed AR assembly manuals on task performance, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex hemodynamic responses, and perceived workload. Published in Human Factors, Vol 68, Issue 9.
Why it mattersfNIRS-measured cognitive load across manual formats gives workplace designers workload data rather than preference surveys, useful for AR rollout decisions.
Cited by
No citations on record.