Source record

Published by Human Factors (SAGE / HFES) (T1 source). The original is at https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00187208261437519?af=R.

Pipeline notes

The summary and note below are generated by the signal pipeline — they are Beyond Desk’s reading, not quotations from the source.

Peer-reviewed Human Factors study comparing a large set of specific job rotation schemes, measuring biomechanical risk, body discomfort, and psychosocial demands to assess effectiveness at reducing musculoskeletal disorder risk among workers.

Empirically compares many rotation schemes rather than endorsing rotation as a blanket control, offering evidence for designing rotation cycles in desk-based and mixed-task work.

Cited by

No citations on record.