When Not to Automate: A Formal Protocol for Human Preservation in AI-Optimized Organizations
3.60T1 sourcearXiv cs.HC
Source record
Published by arXiv cs.HC (T1 source). The original is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.15944.
Pipeline notes
The summary and note below are generated by the signal pipeline — they are Beyond Desk’s reading, not quotations from the source.
SummaryProposes PHP-AIO, a five-gate decision protocol for automation choices that quantifies unpriced systemic risks (tacit knowledge loss, resilience reduction, regulatory exposure, institutional capital degradation) via a composite check and an automation-debt measure ρ(P). Applied to stylized role profiles, it produces distinct automate/augment/hybrid/preserve outcomes where standard ROI would uniformly automate.
Why it mattersA formal counterweight to automation-first thinking, with a specific gating procedure and quantitative debt measure that practitioners can test against their own role inventories.
Cited by
No citations on record.
