Source record

Published by arXiv cs.MA (T1 source). The original is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14713.

Pipeline notes

The summary and note below are generated by the signal pipeline — they are Beyond Desk’s reading, not quotations from the source.

Pre-registered, identity-masked experiment with 44 economics meta-analysis authors: a single-pass frontier model report was preferred over two multi-agent debate tools, despite debate using roughly thirty times the tokens. AI judges nearly always placed real journal referee reports last.

Empirical counter-evidence to multi-agent debate hype: the simpler single-pass approach won on author-judged usefulness while using 1/30th the compute, and AI judges disagreed with the authors' ranking.

Cited by

No citations on record.