When Is Delegated Play Truthful? Within-Range Regret and the Trilemma of Aligned Delegation
4.00T1 sourcearXiv cs.MA
Source record
Published by arXiv cs.MA (T1 source). The original is at https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14357.
Pipeline notes
The summary and note below are generated by the signal pipeline — they are Beyond Desk’s reading, not quotations from the source.
SummaryA theoretical paper formalizing when a principal should describe preferences honestly to an automated proxy. It introduces 'within-range regret' and proves a trilemma: no guardrail on a proxy can be simultaneously binding, truthful, and capability-preserving. Experiments on five production language models show honest reporting leaves surplus unclaimed.
Why it mattersIdentifies a structural reason honest prompting fails when guardrails are added, unifying autobidding and language-model elicitation theory. Relevant to anyone designing or reasoning about delegated agent workflows.
Cited by
No citations on record.
